4.7 Article

Shared and unique risk factors between lifetime purging and objective binge eating: a twin study

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
卷 38, 期 10, 页码 1455-1464

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291708002791

关键词

objective binge eating; prospective risk factors; self-induced vomiting; twins

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [160009]
  2. University of Melbourne [ID 310667]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Objective binge eating (OBE) and self-induced vomiting (SIV) occur and co-occur across a range of eating disorders but the extent to which the risk factors for these two behaviours overlap is unclear. Examination of this overlap was the focus of the current report. Method. A population of female Australian twins (n = 1002), mean age 35 years (s.D. = 2.11, range 28-40), participated in three waves of data collection and were assessed for lifetime disordered eating with a semi-structured interview at wave 3 and a self-report questionnaire at wave 1; risk factors were assessed via self-report at waves 1 and 3. Results. Non-shared environmental influences were the largest contributor to the variance of both OBE and SIV, with a more modest contribution of genetic influences. Between 5% and 14% of the environmental risk factors for OBE and SIV were shared and 27-100% of genetic risk factors were shared. SIV initiation was predicted by higher neuroticism and novelty seeking and lower maternal and paternal care, whilst lower levels of perceived paternal care, higher lifetime BMI, and a wider BMI range predicted OBE initiation. Retrospective correlates associated with both SIV and OBE onset were parental comments about weight, whilst higher levels of parental conflict, expectations and criticism was associated with OBE onset only. Conclusions. The substantial extent of non-overlap between risk factors for SIV and OBE suggests that each of these behavioural disturbances warrants future investigation in its own right, not only when they occur in conjunction with each other.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据