4.6 Review

Reviewing Employee Turnover: Focusing on Proximal Withdrawal States and an Expanded Criterion

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
卷 138, 期 5, 页码 831-858

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0027983

关键词

turnover; job embeddedness; mind-sets; involuntary staying; psychological quits

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We reconceptualize employee turnover to promote researchers' understanding and prediction of why employees quit or stay in employing institutions. A literature review identifies shortcomings with prevailing turnover dimensions. In response, we expand the conceptual domain of the turnover criterion to include multiple types of turnover (notably, involuntary quits) and multiple types of staying. Guided by the premise that everyone eventually leaves; no one stays with an organization forever, we also suggest considering where leavers end up or post-exit destinations, such as another job, full-time parenting, or educational pursuits. We propose proximal withdrawal states that motivate members to participate or withdraw from organizations as an expanded criterion. These motivational states precede turnover and are derived from 2 overarching dimensions: desired employment status (whether employees want to stay or leave) and perceived volitional control (whether quit or stay decisions are completely up to them or at least partially under external regulation). Crossing these dimensions yields 4 prime states: enthusiastic leavers and stayers and reluctant leavers and stayers. We further subdivide these mind-sets into subtypes by differentiating employer from other forms of external control (e.g., family). Focusing on more common subtypes, we explain how they arise from particular motivational forces and profile how they differ by attitudes, behaviors, and turnover speed and destinations. We further discuss ways to measure this expanded criterion and proximal states (and subtypes) and investigate the latter's profiled differences. Finally, we discuss scientific and practical implications and future research directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据