4.6 Article

Why do oncology outpatients who report emotional distress decline help?

期刊

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 812-818

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3729

关键词

cancer; oncology; distress; help-seeking; depression; anxiety

资金

  1. Cancer Institute NSW
  2. Nursing and Allied Health Scholarship and Support Scheme (NAHSS) - Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveMany patients who experience distress do not seek help, and little is known about the reasons for this. We explored the reasons for declining help among patients who had significant emotional distress. MethodsData were collected through QUICATOUCH screening at an Australian hospital. Oncology outpatients scoring 4 or more on the Distress Thermometer were asked if they would like help' with their distress. Those who declined help were asked their reasons. Demographic variables and a clinical measure of anxiety and depression (PSYCH-6) were used to identify factors associated with reasons for declining help. ResultsOf 311 patients with significant distress, 221 (71%) declined help. The most common reasons were I prefer to manage myself' (n=99, 46%); already receiving help' (n=52, 24%) and my distress is not severe enough' (n=50, 23%). Younger patients and women were more likely to decline help and were more likely to already be receiving help. Distress score and PSYCH-6 scores were significantly lower among patients who rated their distress as not severe enough to require help. Nevertheless, there were patients who had maximal scores on distress and PSYCH in each group. ConclusionsTwo common patient barriers to help with distress are a preference for self-help and a belief that distress is not sufficiently severe to warrant intervention. These beliefs were held by a sizeable proportion of individuals who reported very high levels of distress. Qualitative research and subsequent interventions for overcoming these barriers are required to obtain the most benefit from distress screening programs. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据