4.6 Review

Correlates of post-traumatic stress symptoms and growth in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 624-634

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3719

关键词

post-traumatic growth; post-traumatic stress disorder; systematic review; meta-analysis; oncology; cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to examine the relationships among demographic, medical, and psychosocial factors and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and post-traumatic growth (PTG) in oncology populations. MethodA systematic search identified k=116 relevant studies published between 1990 and 2012. Meta-analyses synthesized results from studies that reported data on correlates of PTSS (k=26) or PTG (k=48). A meta-analysis was performed for k=5 studies reporting the correlation between PTSS and PTG. ResultsPost-traumatic stress symptoms were associated with depression (r=0.56), anxiety (r=0.65), distress (r=0.62), social support (r=-0.33), and physical quality of life (r=-0.44). PTG was associated with age (r=-0.08), gender (r=-0.15), distress (r=-0.16), depression (r=-0.06), social support (r=0.30), optimism (r=0.27), positive reappraisal (r=0.46), spirituality (r=0.33), and religious coping (r=0.36). There was a small positive relationship between PTSS and PTG (r=0.13). ConclusionsPost-traumatic stress symptoms and PTG appear to be independent constructs, rather than opposite ends of a single dimension. This is reflected in a small relationship between these variables and different psychosocial correlates. PTSS were strongly associated with variables reflecting a general state of negative affect. Optimism, spirituality, and positive coping styles were associated with PTG. It remains unclear how they are associated with PTSS, given the lack of relevant studies. Longitudinal research is required to examine how psychosocial factors influence the relationship between PTSS and PTG. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据