4.6 Article

Designing psycho-oncology randomised trials and cluster randomised trials: variance components and intra-cluster correlation of commonly used psychosocial measures

期刊

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 1738-1747

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3205

关键词

longitudinal; statistical methodology; design; ICC; oncology; cancer

资金

  1. Cancer Councils of New South Wales and Queensland [RG36/05]
  2. Australian Fertility Decision Aid Collaborative Group and The Cancer Council, New South Wales [RG 06-13]
  3. National Breast Cancer Foundation
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [950461]
  5. NHMRC [509143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The study aims to provide information about variance components of psychosocial outcomes: within and between-participant variance, within-participant correlation and for cluster randomised trials, the intra-cluster correlation (ICC) and, also, to demonstrate how estimates of these variance components and ICCs can be used to design randomised trials and cluster randomised trials. Method Data from 15 longitudinal multi-centre psycho-oncology studies were analysed, and variance components including ICCs were estimated. Studies with psychosocial outcomes that had at least one measurement post-baseline including individual randomised controlled trials, cluster randomised trials and observational studies were included. Results Variance components and ICCs from 87 outcome measures were estimated. The unadjusted, single timepoint (first post-baseline) ICCs ranged from 0 to 0.16, with a median value of 0.022 and inter-quartile range 0 to 0.0605. The longitudinal ICCs ranged from 0 to 0.09 with a median value of 0.0007 and inter-quartile range 0 to 0.018. Conclusions Although the magnitude of variance components and ICCs used for sample-size calculation cannot be known in advance of the study, published estimates can help reduce the uncertainty in sample-size calculations. Psycho-oncology researchers should be conservative in their sample-size calculations and use approaches that improve efficiency in their design and analysis. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据