4.6 Article

L-Arginine grafted alginate hydrogel beads: A novel pH-sensitive system for specific protein delivery

期刊

Arabian Journal of Chemistry
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 355-365

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.01.007

关键词

Grafted alginate; Arginine-g-alginate; pH-Sensitive hydrogel beads; Oral protein delivery; Thermal properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel pH-sensitive hydrogels based on L-arginine grafted alginate (Arg-g-Alg) hydrogel beads were synthesized and utilized as a new carrier for protein delivery (BSA) in specific pH media. L-arginine was grafted onto the polysaccharide backbone of virgin alginate via amine functions. Evidences of grafting of alginate were extracted from FT-IR and thermal analysis, while the morphological structure of Arg-g-Alg hydrogel beads was investigated by SEM photographs. Factors affecting on the grafting process e.g. L-arginine concentration, reaction time, reaction temperature, reaction pH, and crosslinking conditions, have been studied. Whereas, grafting efficiency of each factor was evaluated. Grafting of alginate has improved both thermal and morphological properties of Arg-g-Alg hydrogel beads. The swelling behavior of Arg-g-Alg beads was determined as a function of pH and compared with virgin calcium alginate beads. The cumulative in vitro release profiles of BSA loaded beads were studied at different pHs for simulating the physiological environments of the gastrointestinal tract. The amount of BSA released from neat alginate beads at pH 2 was almost 15% after 5 h, while the Arg-g-Alg beads at the same conditions were clearly higher than 45%, then it increased to 90% at pH 7.2. Accordingly, grafting of alginate has improved its release profile behavior particularly in acidic media. The preliminary results clearly suggested that the Arg-g-Alg hydrogel may be a potential candidate for polymeric carrier for oral delivery of protein or drugs. (C) 2014 King Saud University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据