4.6 Article

Sexual dysfunction and spousal communication in couples coping with prostate cancer

期刊

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 735-746

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/pon.1449

关键词

prostate cancer; sexual function; marriage; couples; communication patterns

资金

  1. US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command [W81XWH-0401-0425]
  2. [5P30 CA16672-25]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To characterize the sexual function of both prostate cancer patients and their partners, and to examine whether associations between sexual dysfunction and psychosocial adjustment vary depending on spousal communication patterns. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 116 prostate cancer patients and their partners completed psychosocial questionnaires. Results: Patients and partners reported high rates of sexual dysfunction. Within couples, patients' and their partners' sexual function was moderately to highly correlated (r = 0.30-0.74). When patients had poor erectile function, their partners were more likely to report that the couple avoided open spousal discussions; this in turn was associated with partners' marital distress (Sobel's Z = 12.47, p = 0.001). Patients and partners who reported high levels (+ISD) of mutual constructive communication also reported greater marital adjustment, regardless of their own sexual satisfaction. In contrast, greater sexual dissatisfaction was associated with poorer marital adjustment in patients and partners who reported low levels (-ISD) of mutual constructive communication (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings underscore the need for psychosocial interventions that facilitate healthy spousal communication and address the sexual rehabilitation needs of patients and their partners after prostate cancer treatment. Although some couples may be reluctant to engage in constructive cancer-related discussions about sexual problems, such discussions may help alleviate the negative impact that sexual problems have on prostate cancer patients' and their partners' marital adjustment. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据