4.2 Article

Decreased default-mode network homogeneity in unaffected siblings of schizophrenia patients at rest

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
卷 224, 期 3, 页码 218-224

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.08.014

关键词

Unaffected siblings; Schizophrenia; Network homogeneity; Independent component analysis; Default mode network

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81260210]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province [2014GXNSFGA118010, 2013GXNSFAA019107]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2012HM065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dysconnectivity hypothesis proposes that abnormal resting state connectivity within the default-mode network (DMN) plays a key role in schizophrenia. Little is known, however, about alterations of the network homogeneity (NH) of the DMN in unaffected siblings of patients with schizophrenia. Unaffected siblings have unique advantages as subjects of neuroimaging studies independent of the clinical and treatment issues that complicate studies of the patients themselves. In the present study, we investigated NH of the DMN in unaffected siblings of schizophrenia. Participants comprised 46 unaffected siblings of schizophrenia patients and 50 age-, sex-, and education-matched healthy controls who underwent resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Automated NH and group independent component analysis (ICA) approaches were used to analyze the data. Compared with healthy controls, the unaffected siblings of schizophrenia patients showed decreased DMN homogeneity in the left precuneus. No significantly increased DMN homogeneity was found in the sibling group relative to the control group. Our results suggest that there is decreased NH of the DMN in unaffected siblings of schizophrenia patients and indicate that the alternative perspective of examining the DMN NH in patients' siblings may improve understanding of the nature of schizophrenia. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据