4.2 Article

Neuroanatomical deficits in drug-naive adult patients with generalized social anxiety disorder: A voxel-based morphometry study

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
卷 214, 期 1, 页码 9-15

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.06.002

关键词

Social anxiety disorder; Voxel-based morphometry; DARTEL; Gray matter density; Amygdala; Papez circuit

资金

  1. 863 Program [2008AA02Z408]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation for Excellent Young Scholar [81222018]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation [30900361]
  4. 973 Project [2008CB517407]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little is known, so far, about the cerebral structural deficits in drug-naive adult social anxiety disorder (SAD) patients. The present study aimed to explore the cerebral anatomic deficits in drug-naive adult generalized SAD patients using voxel-based morphometric analysis with DARTEL. High-resolution T1-weighted images were acquired from 20 drug-naive adult SAD patients and 19 age-, sex- and education-matched controls. The volumes of gray matter, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid, and total intracranial volume were compared between groups using two-sample t-tests with age and gender as covariares. Gray matter density (GMD) was compared between groups using voxel-wise two-sample t-test analysis. Correlation analysis was used to identify any associations between regional GMD and clinical symptoms. Compared with healthy controls, SAD patients showed significantly lower GMD in the bilateral thalami, right amygdala, and right precuneus. Furthermore, the GMD in the right amygdala was negatively related to the disease duration, but positively correlated with age of onset. Our findings demonstrated that cerebral anatomic deficits could be found within limbic and thalamic areas in drug-naive SAD patients, which provides structural information to complement the functional alterations observed in the same regions. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All tights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据