4.2 Article

Decreased fMRI activity in the hippocampus of patients with schizophrenia compared to healthy control participants, tested on a wayfinding task in a virtual town

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
卷 211, 期 1, 页码 47-56

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.10.005

关键词

Navigation; Cognitive map; Episodic memory; Contextual binding; Neuroimaging; Healthy participants

资金

  1. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  2. University of Ottawa Medical Research Fund
  3. Ontario Ministry of Development and Trade
  4. Royal Ottawa Health Care Foundation
  5. CIHR [64381]
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  7. University of Ottawa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intact episodic memory requires the ability to make associations between the contextual features of an event, referred to as contextual binding. Binding processes combine different contextual elements into a complete memory representation. It has been proposed that binding errors during the encoding process are responsible for the episodic memory impairments reported in schizophrenia. Since the hippocampus is critical for contextual binding and episodic memory, it was hypothesized that patients with schizophrenia would show a deficit in information processing in the hippocampus, measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In the current experiment, 21 patients with schizophrenia and 22 healthy control participants were scanned while being tested on navigating in a virtual town (i.e. find the grocery store from the school), a task that was shown to be critically dependent on the hippocampus. Between-group comparisons revealed significantly less activation among patients relative to controls in the left middle frontal gyrus, and right and left hippocampi. We propose that the context and the content are not appropriately linked, therefore affecting the formation of a cognitive map representation in the patient group and eliciting a contextual binding deficit. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据