4.2 Article

Extensive abnormality of brain white matter integrity in pathological gambling

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
卷 194, 期 3, 页码 340-346

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.08.001

关键词

Addiction; Impulse control disorder; MRI; Voxel-based morphometry; Diffusion tensor imaging

资金

  1. Finnish Alcohol Research Foundation
  2. Finnish Medical Foundation
  3. Turku University Central Hospital
  4. Turku University Foundation
  5. Paulo Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in substance use disorders have shown brain white matter integrity abnormalities, but there are no studies in pathological gambling, a form of behavioral addiction. Our objective was to investigate possible changes in regional brain gray and white matter volumes, and axonal white matter integrity in pathological gamblers compared to healthy controls. Twenty-four subjects (12 clinically diagnosed male pathological gamblers and 12 age-matched healthy male volunteers) underwent structural and diffusion weighted brain MRI scans, which were analyzed with voxel-based morphometry and tract based spatial statistics. In pathological gamblers, widespread lower white matter integrity (lower fractional anisotropy, higher mean diffusivity) was seen in multiple brain regions including the corpus callosum, the cingulum, the superior longitudinal fascicle, the inferior fronto-occipital fascicle, the anterior limb of internal capsule, the anterior thalamic radiation, the inferior longitudinal fascicle and the uncinate/inferior fronto-occipital fascicle. There were no volumetric differences in gray or white matter between pathological gamblers and controls. The results suggest that pathological gambling is associated with extensive lower integrity of several brain white matter tracts. The diffusion abnormality closely resembles previous findings in individuals with substance addictions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据