4.2 Article

Prefrontal hypoactivation during cognitive control in early abstinent methamphetamine-dependent subjects

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
卷 194, 期 3, 页码 287-295

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.04.010

关键词

Methamphetamine; Stroop; fMRI; Cognitive control; Prefrontal cortex; Insula

资金

  1. National Institutes for Health (NIH) [P20DA022539, R01 DA020726, RL1DA024853, M01 RR00865 (UCLA GCRC)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individuals who abuse methamphetamine (MA) perform at levels below those of healthy controls on tests that require cognitive control. As cognitive control deficits may influence the success of treatment for addiction, we sought to help clarify the neural correlates of this deficit. MA-dependent (n = 10, abstinent 4-7 days) and control subjects (n = 18) performed a color-word Stroop task, which requires cognitive control, during functional MRI (fMRI). The task included a condition in which participants were required to respond to one stimulus dimension while ignoring another conflicting dimension, and another condition without conflict. We compared the groups on performance and neural activation in the two conditions. MA-dependent subjects made more errors and responded more slowly than controls. Controlling for response times in the incongruent condition, voxel-wise mixed effects analyses (whole-brain corrected) demonstrated that MA-dependent subjects had less activation than control subjects in the right inferior frontal gyrus, supplementary motor cortex/anterior cingulate gyrus and the anterior insular cortex during the incongruent condition only. MA-dependent subjects did not exhibit greater activation in any brain region in either of the Stroop conditions. These preliminary findings suggest that hypofunction in cortical areas that are important for executive function underlies cognitive control deficits associated with MA dependence. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据