4.7 Article

Increased adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels predict severity of depression after six months of follow-up in outpatients with major depressive disorder

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 270, 期 -, 页码 246-252

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.09.047

关键词

ACTH; Adrenocorticotropic hormone; HPA axis; Major depressive disorder; Patient Health Questionnaire; PHQ-9

资金

  1. Original Technology Research Program for Brain Science through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2016M3C7A1947307]
  2. Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the NRF - Korean government, MSIP [NRF-2017M3A9F1027323]
  3. Samsung Medical Center grant [SMO1161491]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have reported dysfunction in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Outpatients diagnosed with MDD (n = 199) underwent psychological evaluation, and were followed up with a phone interview after 6 months, using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). At 6-month follow-up, 59 out of 199 patients with MDD were still depressed (29.5%), as shown by scores >= 10 on the PHQ-9. The depressed group at follow-up showed significantly higher anxiety and suicidality levels at baseline than the non-depressed group at follow-up. Among the complete blood counts, lipid profiles, and hormone levels, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) was the only parameter that was significantly increased in the still depressed group. Levels higher than 40 pg/mL of ACTH at baseline were associated with higher depression scores at follow-up. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that ACTH and cortisol predicted depression scores at follow-up, after controlling for baseline depression scores. Increased ACTH level at baseline may predict ongoing symptoms and severity of depression at follow-up, suggesting the role of dysfunctional HPA axis in MDD prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据