4.7 Article

Sleep profiles and CBT-I response in schizophrenia and related psychoses

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 268, 期 -, 页码 279-287

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.07.027

关键词

Sleep profile; Insomnia; Hypersomnia; Cognitive behavioural therapy; Schizophrenia; Psychosis; Sleep duration

资金

  1. North Metropolitan Health Service Mental Health (NMHS MH), School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences at the University of Western Australia
  2. Schizophrenia Research Institute Daniel Beck Memorial Postgraduate Student Award 2014

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated sleep subtypes in schizophrenia, and their response to Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) treatment. Sleep profiling was conducted using latent class analysis on baseline Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index data (N = 74 outpatients with schizophrenia who were poor sleepers, 52% male, mean age = 41.4 years). Of these, 40 took part in CBT-I treatment. Analyses revealed three sleep subtypes based on total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (SE), and sleep onset latency (SOL) parameters: Cluster 1 ('classic severe insomnia', 44.6%), Cluster 2 ('insomnia with normal sleep duration', 37.8%), and Cluster 3 ('insomnia with hypersomnia', 17.6%). Gains analysis of pre- and post-treatment data from CBT-I participants revealed improvements in sleep and psychopathology in all three clusters, although there were some group differences in the areas and magnitude of improvement. Cluster 1 showed the greatest benefits with longer TST and improved SE. Cluster 2 showed a comparatively blunted treatment response although TST moved closer to recommended sleep guidelines. Cluster 3 showed significant reductions in TST. Altogether, this is the first demonstration of different sleep profiles in schizophrenia and their influence on treatment response to CBT-I. It also supports the notion that therapies should be tailored to the person and their insomnia presentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据