4.7 Article

Motor behavior characteristics in various phases of bipolar disorder revealed through biomechanical analysis: Quantitative measures of activity and energy variables during gait and sit-to-walk

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 269, 期 -, 页码 93-101

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.062

关键词

Bipolar disorder; Activity; Energy; Biomarkers; Gait; Sit-to-walk

资金

  1. American Society of Biomechanics
  2. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation
  3. Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies at the University of Michigan
  4. Heinz C. Prechter Bipolar Research Fund
  5. Richard Tam Foundation at the University of Michigan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abnormal motor behaviors influenced by high or low energy states are key signs and symptoms for mania/hypomania or depression, respectively. Clinical evaluation is currently based on qualitative, subjective self-reports. We aimed to objectively quantify activity and energy variables during gait and sit-to-walk in bipolar disorder. Gait and sit-to-walk were analyzed in 31 individuals with bipolar disorder (five hypomanic, 14 euthymic and 12 depressed)'and 14 healthy controls using a motion capture system and two force platforms. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and Altman Self Rating Mania Scale were administered to evaluate mood symptoms. During gait and sit-to-walk, the hypomanic group had 20-30% greater movement speed and produced 10-60% greater peak force, and 40-140% greater peak power in the knee or ankle compared to the euthymic, depressed and healthy groups. Biomechanical measures of activity and energy correlated with clinically defined hypomania. Our findings suggest that movement speed and force production could serve as objective activity and energy markers for hypomanic symptoms in individuals with bipolar disorder, but this study was based on a relatively small sample size, and the laboratory-based assessments are not directly transferable to a clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据