4.7 Article

Mental health stigma and primary health care decisions

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 218, 期 1-2, 页码 35-38

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.028

关键词

Serious mental illness; Primary care; Health decisions; Stigma

资金

  1. Veteran Affairs Health Services Research and Development Services through the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare Services [IIR 08-086]
  2. SC MIRECC
  3. Translational Research Institute at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences [8 UL1 TR000039-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

People with serious mental illness have higher rates of mortality and morbidity due to physical illness. In part, this occurs because primary care and other health providers sometimes make decisions contrary to typical care standards. This might occur because providers endorse mental illness stigma, which seems inversely related to prior personal experience with mental illness and mental health care. In this study, 166 health care providers (42.2% primary care, 57.8% mental health practice) from the Veteran's Affairs (VA) medical system completed measures of stigma characteristics, expected adherence, and subsequent health decisions (referral to a specialist and refill pain prescription) about a male patient with schizophrenia who was seeking help for low back pain due to arthritis. Research participants reported comfort with previous mental health interventions. Path analyses showed participants who endorsed stigmatizing characteristics of the patient were more likely to believe he would not adhere to treatment and hence, less likely to refer to a specialist or refill his prescription. Endorsement of stigmatizing characteristics was inversely related to comfort with one's previous mental health care. Implications of these findings will inform a program meant to enhance VA provider attitudes about people with mental illness, as well as their health decisions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据