4.7 Article

Anxiety, depression, impulsivity and substance misuse in violent and non-violent adolescent boys in detention in China

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 216, 期 3, 页码 379-384

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.024

关键词

Incarcerated youths; Juvenile offenders; Psychiatric disorders; Impulsivity; Internalizing and externalizing symptoms

资金

  1. Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2012BAK16B00]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [30800368, 81071107]
  3. Shanghai Key Lab of Forensic Medicine [KF1006]
  4. MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences [13YJC190033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present investigation aims to identify the factors which differentiate violent from non-violent juvenile offenders, with a particular emphasis on the association between internalizing psychiatric morbidity (i.e. anxiety and depression), impulsivity, substance misuse, and violence. A total of 323 incarcerated male juvenile offenders from one of three Youth Detention Centers (YDCs) in China were recruited between August 2007 and November 2008. Interviews were conducted by trained psychiatrists using the Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11), the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED), and the Birleson Depression Self-Rating Scale (DSRS) to assess impulsivity, anxiety and depression, respectively. The Schedule for Affective Disorder and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children Present and Lifetime (K-SADS-PL) was also used to assess psychiatric diagnoses. Violent offenders had significantly higher BIS-11 total scores, and attention and nonplanning subscale scores (p < 0.05). In the multiple logistic regression model, substance use disorders (SUD) and BIS-11 total scores independently predicted violence. Prison-based treatment services designed to reduce impulsivity and substance misuse in juvenile detention facilities should be prioritized. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据