4.7 Article

Case-control association study of 14 variants of CREB1, CREBBP and CREM on diagnosis and treatment outcome in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 198, 期 1, 页码 39-46

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.08.022

关键词

CREB1; CREBBP; CREM; Major depressive disorder; Bipolar disorder

资金

  1. Medical Research Center, Korea Science and Engineering Foundation, Republic of Korea [R13-2002-005-04001-0]
  2. Korean Health 21 R & D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [A050047]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some evidence suggests an association between genetic variants within the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) response element-binding protein (CREB), CREB binding protein (CREBBP) and cAMP response element-modulator (CREM) and several psychiatric disorders. The present study investigated whether some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within these genes could be associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD) and whether they could predict clinical outcomes in Korean inpatients treated with antidepressants and mood stabilizers, respectively. The sample comprised 145 patients with MDD, 132 patients with BD and 170 psychiatrically healthy controls. Participants were genotyped for 14 SNPs within CREB1, CREBBP and CREM. Baseline and final clinical measures, including the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Young Mania Rating Scale for patients with MDD and BD, respectively, were recorded. All p-values were 2-tailed, and statistical significance was conservatively set at the 0.006 level in order to reduce the likelihood of false positive results. We failed to observe any association of the 14 SNPs genotypes or alleles with clinical improvement, response and remission rates as well as final outcomes in any of such disorders. Our findings suggest that the 14 SNP under investigation in our study do not influence diagnosis and treatment response in patients with MDD and BD. However, taking into account the several limitations of our study, further research is needed to draw more definitive conclusions. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据