4.7 Article

Relationship of morningness-eveningness questionnaire score to melatonin and sleep timing, body mass index and atypical depressive symptoms in peri- and post-menopausal women

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 188, 期 1, 页码 88-95

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.12.010

关键词

Atypical depression; Menopause; Morningness-eveningness; Chronotype; Dim light melatonin onset; Midsleep time; BMI

资金

  1. NIH [R01 MH080159-01A1]
  2. NIH Clinical Research Center (CRC) [M01 RR00827]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous work shows a relationship between measures of morning or evening preference (e.g., morningness-veningness questionnaire (MEQ) scores) and melatonin and sleep timing, body mass index (BMI) and mood. This study explores the relationship of these factors to atypical depression (ATD) symptoms, particularly increased appetite and hypersomnia, in depressed and non-depressed peri and post-menopausal women. Participants were 19 normal control subjects and 10 depressed patients, 46-72 years of age. In a university hospital setting, we administered the MEQ and Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Seasonal Affective Disorders (SIGH-SAD version), which includes a measure of ATD, 3-5 weeks before obtaining nighttime polysomnography and overnight plasma melatonin in dim light (<30 lx). Scores on SIGH-SAD appetite-related items were significantly correlated with MEQ dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) time and midsleep time (MST); BMI was related to MST, sleep end time, phase-angle differences between sleep and melatonin timing, and appetite measures. Results suggest that relative to women with earlier DLMOs and MSTs, depressed peri- and post-menopausal women whose DLMOs and MSTs are phase-delayed may experience increases in appetite, hypersomnia, and BMI. These symptoms might be relieved by sleep or light manipulations that advance melatonin and sleep timing parameters. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据