4.7 Article

Asocial beliefs as predictors of asocial behavior in schizophrenia

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 177, 期 1-2, 页码 65-70

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.01.005

关键词

Social functioning; Neurocognition; Emotion perception; Beliefs and expectancies

资金

  1. Foundation for Cognitive Therapy and Research
  2. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  3. Heinz Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poor social and vocational outcomes have long been observed in schizophrenia, and therapeutic outcomes have been modest. Most studies have identified neurocognition and emotion perception as important contributors to social functioning. Recent research has suggested that personal beliefs, attitudes, and expectancies contribute to negative symptoms. However, the impact of specific beliefs and expectancies on social withdrawal in schizophrenia has not been examined. The present study explored: 1. whether asocial beliefs made a significant contribution to social functioning after accounting for neurocognitive performance and emotion perception; and, 2. whether asocial beliefs predicted asocial behavior in a longitudinal design. 123 outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder completed tests of neurocognitive performance, emotion perception, asocial beliefs, symptomatology, and functional outcome. A subset of 13 outpatients was retested one year after the initial assessment. Hierarchical regression indicated that asocial beliefs accounted for 18% of the variability in social functioning. Depression and negative symptoms explained another 9% of the dispersion. Contrary to expectations, neurocognition and emotion perception accounted for less than 1% of the variance. In the longitudinal study, baseline asocial beliefs predicted asocial behavior one year later. Asocial beliefs predict poor social functioning in schizophrenia, and may be modifiable by psychological interventions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据