4.7 Article

Plasma homocysteine in schizophrenia: Determinants and clinical correlations in Tunisian patients free from antipsychotics

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 179, 期 1, 页码 24-29

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.04.008

关键词

Anhedonia; Apathy; Asociality; Avolition; Folate; Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; Negative symptoms; Vitamin B12

资金

  1. Schizophrenia, 'F' Department, Razi Hospital, Tunisia [03/04]
  2. Department of Biochemistry, Rabta Hospital, Tunisia (Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Technology) [05/UR/08-08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The existence of association between hyperhomocysteinaemia (HHC) and schizophrenia has been suggested by several recent studies. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of HHC and its main determinants, and sought a correlation with clinical features in Tunisian patients with schizophrenia. Plasma homocysteine (Hcy), folate, and vitamin B12, as well as the C677T methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphism, were studied in 33 patients with schizophrenia, all free from antipsychotic treatment, and 35 age- and smoking-habit-matched healthy subjects as controls. Biochemical determinations and psychometric evaluations were carried out in patients before the administration of antipsychotics. The prevalence of HHC was higher and plasma B12 vitamin was significantly lower in patients. There was no significant difference in genotypic distribution and allelic frequency of the C677T MTHFR polymorphism between groups. Hcy was significantly correlated to the 'anhedonia-asociality' subscales of the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). This study showed an association between HHC and schizophrenia, especially with the negative symptoms of the disease. In the Tunisian population, HHC in schizophrenia seems to be linked to vitamin B12 deficiency, likely caused by a lack of dietary animal proteins. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据