4.7 Article

Time discrimination deficits in schizophrenia patients with first-rank (passivity) symptoms

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 167, 期 1-2, 页码 12-20

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.04.004

关键词

Psychoses; Cognitive symptoms; Time perception; Neuropsychology

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [404117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schizophrenia patients with first-rank (passivity) symptoms (FRS) report a loss of clear boundaries between the self and others and that their thoughts and actions are controlled by external forces. One of the more widely accepted explanatory models of FRS suggests a dysfunction in the 'forward model' system, whose role consists in predicting the sensory consequences of actions [Frith, C., 2006. The neural basis of hallucinations and delusions. Comptes Rendus Biologies 328, 169-175.]. There has been recent interest in the importance of timing precision underlying both the functioning of the forward model, and in processes contributing to the mechanisms of self-recognition [Haggard, P., Martin, F., Taylor-Clarke, M., Jeannerod, M., Franck, N., 2003. Awareness of action in schizophrenia. Neuroreport 14, 1081-1085.]. In the current study, we examined whether schizophrenia patients with FRS have a time perception impairment, using an auditory discrimination task requiring judgements of temporal intervals. Thirty-five schizophrenia patients (15 with, and 20 without, FRS), and 16 non-clinical controls completed the task. The results showed that patients with FRS experienced time differently by underestimating the duration of time intervals. Given the role of timing in shaping sensory awareness and in the formation of causal mental associations, a breakdown in timing mechanisms may affect the processes relating to the perceived control of actions and mental events, leading to disturbances of self-recognition in FRS. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据