4.5 Article

Effects of N-acetyl cysteine on cognitive function in bipolar disorder

期刊

PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES
卷 66, 期 6, 页码 514-517

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2012.02392.x

关键词

bipolar disorder; clinical trial; cognition; N-acetyl cysteine; oxidative

资金

  1. NIH
  2. Simons Autism Foundation
  3. Cancer Council of Victoria
  4. Stanley Medical Research Foundation
  5. MBF
  6. NHMRC
  7. Beyond Blue
  8. Geelong Medical Research Foundation
  9. Bristol Myers Squibb
  10. Eli Lilly
  11. GlaxoSmithKline
  12. Organon
  13. Novartis
  14. Mayne Pharma
  15. Servier
  16. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  17. Lilly
  18. ASBD/Servier grant
  19. Barwon Health
  20. Bendigo Health Care Group
  21. Mental Health Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Bipolar disorder is characterized by progressive changes in cognition with declines in executive functioning, memory and sustained attention. Current pharmacotherapies for bipolar disorder target mood symptoms but have not addressed these cognitive changes resulting in euthymic individuals who still experience cognitive deficits. N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) has been shown to have effects on antioxidant status, glutamate transmission, inflammation and neurogenesis. Adjunctive treatment with NAC improves the symptoms experienced by those with bipolar disorder, particularly depression, and it was hypothesized that cognition may also be improved following NAC treatment. Methods As part of a larger randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, participants in the current report were tested at baseline and 6 months to assess changes in cognitive function following either 2000?mg of NAC daily or placebo. Results This study failed to find changes in cognitive function following treatment with NAC compared to placebo. Conclusions While an important pilot study, this study had a small sample size and included a limited battery of cognitive tests. Further investigations on the effects of NAC on cognitive performance in bipolar disorder are required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据