4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor polymorphisms and frontal cortex morphology in schizophrenia

期刊

PSYCHIATRIC GENETICS
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 177-183

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YPG.0b013e3283050a94

关键词

brain-derived neurotrophic factor; cortical thickness; frontal cortex; magnetic resonance imaging; schizophrenia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate associations between brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene polymorphisms and regional frontal cortical thickness and volume in patients with schizophrenia and healthy control participants. Methods BDNF genotyping was performed using polymerase chain reaction and pyrosequencing techniques in 96 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 104 healthy control participants. Cortical morphology was analyzed by processing magnetic resonance brain images with the FreeSurfer software package. General linear model analysis was used to study associations between BDNF variants and cortical thickness in patients and controls, respectively. Regional frontal cortical volumes were defined from automatic cortical parcellations. Results For patients with schizophrenia, there was an association between the BDNF - 633 T/A polymorphism and thickness and volume of distinct subregions of the prefrontal cortex. Data indicated trends toward genotypic associations between the BDNF 270 C/T and 11757 G/C polymorphisms and the volume of specific frontal lobe regions in patients with schizophrenia. Among controls, there were no significant associations between BDNF polymorphisms and cortical thickness. Trends toward genotypic associations between BDNF polymorphisms and volumes of some frontal lobe regions for control participants were observed, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion Polymorphisms in the BDNF gene maybe associated with variation in frontal lobe morphology. Associations seem to be stronger in patients with schizophrenia than in healthy controls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据