4.4 Article

Expression and functional analysis of putative vacuolar Ca2+-transporters (CAXs and ACAs) in roots of salt tolerant and sensitive rice cultivars

期刊

PROTOPLASMA
卷 251, 期 5, 页码 1067-1075

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00709-014-0615-2

关键词

ACA; Cation/H+ exchanger; Ca2+-ATPase; Rice; Root; Salt stress; Vacuole

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan
  3. International Center for Green Biotechnology of Meijo University
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22310131] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vacuolar Ca2+-transporters could play an important role for salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) root. Here, we compared the expression profiles of putative vacuolar cation/H+ exchanger (CAX) and calmodulin-regulated autoinhibited Ca2+-ATPase (ACA) in rice roots of salt tolerant cv. Pokkali and salt sensitive cv. IR29. In addition to five putative vacuolar CAX genes in the rice genome, a new CAX gene (OsCAX4) has been annotated. In the present study, we isolated the OsCAX4 gene and showed that its encoded protein possesses a unique transmembrane structure and is potentially involved in transporting not only Ca2+ but also Mn2+ and Cu2+. These six OsCAX genes differed in their mRNA expression pattern in roots of tolerant versus sensitive rice cultivars exposed to salt stress. For example, OsCAX4 showed abundant expression in IR29 (sensitive) upon prolonged salt stress. The mRNA expression profile of four putative vacuolar Ca2+-ATPases (OsACA4-7) was also examined. Under control conditions, the mRNA levels of OsACA4, OsACA5, and OsACA7 were relatively high and similar among IR29 and Pokkali. Upon salt stress, only OsACA4 showed first a decrease in its expression in Pokkali (tolerant), followed by a significant increase. Based on these results, a role of vacuolar Ca2+ transporter for salt tolerance in rice root was discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据