4.0 Article

Phylogenetic Position and Morphology of Spirotrichosomidae (Parabasalia): New Evidence from Leptospironympha of Cryptocercus punctulatus

期刊

PROTIST
卷 161, 期 1, 页码 122-132

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2009.06.003

关键词

bacterial symbionts; Cryptocercus punctulatus; Leptospironympha; Parabasalia; phylogeny; Spirotrichosomidae

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [227301]
  2. Tula Foundation
  3. Michael Smith Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parabasalia are a large, diverse clade of anaerobic flagellates, many of which inhabit the guts of wood-feeding insects. Because most are uncultivable, molecular data representing the true diversity of Parabasalia only became possible with the application of single-cell techniques, butin the last decade molecular data have accumulated rapidly. Within the Trichonymphida, the most diverse lineage of hypermastigote parabasalids, molecular data are now available from five of the six families, however, one family, the Spirotrichosomidae, has not been sampled at the molecular level, and is very little studied with electron microscopy. Here we examine are presentative of Spirotrichosomidae Leptospironympha of the wood-feeding cockroach Cryptocercus punctulatus-with scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and analyze its small subunit rRNA gene to infer its phylogenetic position. Phylogenetic analyses place Leptospironympha as sister to a clade comprising Eucomonymphidae and Teranymphidae with moderate support. Examination with scanning and transmission electron microscopy reveals new classes of previously undetected symbiotic surface bacteria, a glycocalyx, granular particles on flagella, and putative phagocytosed bacteria. the range of flagellar patterns in Spirotrichosomidae is quite wide, and the possibility that some members may be more closely related to Eucomonymphidae or Teranymphidae is addressed. (C) 2009 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据