4.1 Article

Targeted glycoprotein enrichment and identification in stromal cell secretomes using azido sugar metabolic labeling

期刊

PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
卷 7, 期 5-6, 页码 367-371

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prca.201300006

关键词

Glycoproteins; Metabolic labeling; Prostate cancer; Secretome; Stroma

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute [R21CA137704, R01CA135087]
  2. state of South Carolina SmartState Endowed Research program
  3. American Cancer Society [IRG-97-219-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Effectively identifying the proteins present in the cellular secretome is complicated due to the presence of cellular protein leakage and serum protein supplements in culture media. A metabolic labeling and click chemistry capture method is described that facilitates the detection of lower abundance glycoproteins in the secretome, even in the presence of serum. Experimental design Two stromal cell lines were incubated with tetraacetylated sugar-azide analogs for 48 h in serum-free and low-serum conditions. Sugar-azide labeled glycoproteins were covalently linked to alkyne-beads, followed by on-bead trypsin digestion and MS/MS. The resulting glycoproteins were compared between media conditions, cell lines, and azide-sugar labels. Results Alkyne-bead capture of sugar-azide modified glycoproteins in stromal cell culture media significantly improved the detection of lower abundance secreted glycoproteins compared to standard serum-free secretome preparations. Over 100 secreted glycoproteins were detected in each stromal cell line and significantly enriched relative to a standard secretome preparation. Conclusion and clinical relevance Sugar-azide metabolic labeling is an effective way to enrich for secreted glycoproteins present in cell line secretomes, even in culture media supplemented with serum. The method has utility for identifying secreted stromal proteins associated with cancer progression and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据