4.1 Article

Urinary CD14 as a potential biomarker for benign prostatic hyperplasia - discovery by combining MALDI-TOF-based biostatistics and ESI-MS/MS-based stable-isotope labeling

期刊

PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
卷 5, 期 3-4, 页码 121-132

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prca.201000011

关键词

Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Biomarker; CD14

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC-98-2922-I-006-051]
  2. Department of Health Executive Yuan [DOH-TD-B-111-004]
  3. Medical College & Hospital in Departments of Urology and Pathology of the National Cheng Kung University Hospital [NCKUH-9803021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Quest for specific urinary biomarkers for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Experimental design: Proteomics studies were conducted with urines of the training set to discovering marker candidates that could differentiate BPH from normal subjects by matching results deduced from MALDI-TOF of individual samples and results deduced from nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS-based stable isotope dimethyl labeling of two pooled samples (BPH and normal). Samples were digested before analysis and such an approach takes into account the subject-to-subject variation and differential amount, as well as protein identification. Selected markers were validated by ELISA conducted on the training set and the test set as well as another set of urines collected from prostate cancer patients. Results: Nine marker candidates were identified from proteomics studies; CD14, prostate-specific antigen and pancreatic a-amylase precursor were further selected for ELISA validation. Urinary CD14 is among the best match with high specificity (>81%) for both training and test sets. In addition, from the study of prostate cancer patients, CD14 also allows the distinction of BPH from cancer with high specificity (84-100%) when combined with urinary prostate-specific antigen. Conclusions and clinical relevance: Urinary CD14 is suggested to have a high specificity in the diagnosis of BPH in distinction from normal as well as cancer subjects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据