4.1 Article

Proteomic studies on receptor for advanced glycation end product variants in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

期刊

PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 97-105

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prca.200900128

关键词

alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; Receptor for advanced glycation end products; Sarcoidosis

资金

  1. Funding of Helsinki University Hospital (EVO)
  2. Finnish Antituberculosis Association Foundation
  3. Finnish Medical Foundation
  4. Jalmari and Rauha Ahokas Foundation
  5. Yrjo Jahnsson Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Proteomic screening revealed declined levels of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RACE) in human idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study was undertaken to investigate the different RAGE isoforms in two lung diseases with destruction of the lung parenchyma, i.e. IPF and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Experimental design: RAGE was analyzed by 2-DE, MS and Western blotting using lung tissues from non-smokers, smokers, patients with IPF, COPD and alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (AAT) and by ELISA from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. Results: RAGE, detected by 2-DE in the control lung, was confirmed to be glycosylated, soluble, C-truncated RAGE with characteristics indicative of the presence of endogenous secretory RAGE (esRAGE). Further studies revealed a decrease of the full length-RAGE (FL-RAGE) and its C-terminal processed variant (cRAGE) in the lung tissues of IPF and COPD patients but not in AAT. The esRAGE level was reduced in IPF but was unchanged in COPD. Conclusions and clinical relevance: This study shows an involvement of the three RAGE variants (FL-RAGE, cRAGE, esRAGE) in IPF. The decline of FL-RAGE and cRAGE, but not esRAGE, in COPD lungs is evidence of involvement of specific RAGE variants also in this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据