4.5 Article

A simple integrated system for rapid analysis of sialic-acid-containing N-glycopeptides from human serum

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 1306-1313

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200367

关键词

ACN-improved digestion; Filter-aided sample preparation; Glycoproteomics; Human serum; Sialic acid-containing N-glycopeptide; Ti(IV)-IMAC

资金

  1. Creative Research Group Project by NSFC [21021004]
  2. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [21105101]
  3. China State Key Basic Research Program Grant [2012CB910101, 2012CB910601]
  4. National Key Special Program on Infection diseases [2012ZX10002009-011]
  5. Analytical-Method Innovation Program of MOST [2010IM030500]
  6. Facility Promotion Program from Chinese Academy of Sciences [Y2010041]
  7. Knowledge Innovation program of DICP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Terminal sialylation is very important in cancer biology and has been extensively investigated for the discovery of potential clinical biomarkers of cancers. In this study, we presented a novel approach, by using of Ti(IV)-IMAC, to enrich sialic-acid-containing N-glycopeptides for the analysis of terminal sialylation. Compared with conventional method using TiO2, this approach obtained 2.5 times more glycopeptides and glycosylation sites. Then, a simple integrated system combining filter-aided sample preparation, ACN-improved digestion, and Ti(IV)-IMAC enrichment was established for efficient analysis. In this system, protein digestion, glycopeptide enrichment, and deglycosylation were integrated and were performed sequentially in a single filter unit without any need for desalting, lyophilization, or sample transfer procedures. As a result, the number of identifications was improved by 1.5-fold and the total processing time was drastically reduced to only 78 h. By using this system, fast and efficient analysis of human serum sialylated N-glycoproteome was achieved. From only 1 L of human serum, 217 unique glycopeptides and 194 glycosylation sites were successfully identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据