4.5 Article

Comparative analysis of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and proximity ligation assay (PLA)

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 2063-2070

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201100028

关键词

Cell biology; Fluorescence resonance energy transfer; Flow cytometry; Protein associations; Proximity ligation assay

资金

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) [K72677, K68763]
  2. European Commission [MCRTN-CT-2006-035946-2]
  3. European Social Fund
  4. European Regional Development Fund [TAMOP-4.2.2-08/1-2008- 0019, TAMOP-4.2.1/B-09/1/KONV-2010-0007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and proximity ligation assay (PLA) are techniques used in the investigation of protein interactions but the latter has not been evaluated in a systematic way, prompting us to compare their performance quantitatively. Proteins were labeled with oligonucleotide-or fluorophore-conjugated antibodies and their proximity was analyzed by flow cytometry in order to obtain statistically robust data. Both intermolecular and intramolecular PLA signals reached saturation at high expression levels. At the same time, the FRET efficiency was independent of, while the FRET signal exhibited a strict linear correlation with the expression levels of proteins. When the density of oligonucleotide- and fluorophore-conjugated antibodies was systematically changed by competition with unlabeled antibodies the FRET signal was linearly proportional to the amount of bound fluorophore-tagged antibodies, whereas the PLA signal was again saturated. The saturation phenomenon in PLA could not be eliminated by decreasing the duration of the rolling circle amplification reaction. Our data imply that PLA is a semiquantitative measure of protein colocalizations due to non-linear effects in the reaction and that caution should be exercised when interpreting PLA data in a quantitative way.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据