4.5 Article

Proteomic identification of Hsp70 as a new Plk1 substrate in arsenic trioxide-induced mitotically arrested cells

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 11, 期 22, 页码 4331-4345

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201100329

关键词

2-D DIGE; Arsenic trioxide; Biomedicine; Heat shock protein 70; Mitotic cells; Phosphorylation; Polo-like kinase 1

资金

  1. Ministry of Education
  2. National Health Research Institute [NHRI-EX96-9522BI]
  3. National Science Council (NSC), Taiwan [98-2320-B-002-030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously demonstrated that when arsenic trioxide (ATO)-induced mitotically arrested HeLa S3 cells (AIMACs) were treated with staurosporine (SSP) the cells rapidly exited mitosis. To better define the cellular targets and the underlying mechanisms of AIMACs, we applied 2-D DIGE followed by LC-MS/MS analysis and showed that SSP induced a significant change in the phosphoproteome of AIMACs. Among the proteins whose phosphorylation was modulated by SSP, we identified Hsp70, Rad 23B, and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B as potentially new substrates of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1), an essential serine/ threonine kinase with versatile mitotic functions. Since Hsp70 is a stress protein responsible for ATO treatment, we further identified Thr(13), Ser(362), Ser(631), and Ser(633) on Hsp70 intra-cellularly phosphorylated in AIMACs by combining TiO2 phospho-peptides enrichment and MS/MS analysis. Using antibody specifically against phosph-Ser(631) Hsp70 and further aided by expression of kinase-dead Plk1 and pharmacological inhibition of Plk1, we concluded that Ser(631) on Hsp70 is phosphorylated by Plk1 in AIMACs. By immnuofluorescent staining, we found the colocalization of Hsp70 and Plk1 in AIMACs but not in interphase cells. In addition, Plk1-mediated phosphorylation of Hsp70 prevented AIMACs from mitotic death. Our results reveal that Hsp70 is a novel substrate of Plk1 and that its phosphorylation contributes to attenuation of ATO-induced mitotic abnormalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据