4.5 Article

Bothrops jararaca venom proteome rearrangement upon neonate to adult transition

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 4218-4228

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201100287

关键词

Animal proteomics; Glycosylation; iTRAQ; Ontogenetic venom variation; Snake venom

资金

  1. FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo) [07/54626-7, 98/14307-9]
  2. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)
  3. Rede de Proteoma de Sao Paulo [FAPESP 2004/14846-0/FINEP 01.07.0290.00]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [98/14307-9] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pharmacological activities displayed by Bothrops jararaca venom undergo a significant ontogenetic shift. Similarly, the diet of this species changes from ectothermic prey in early life to endothermic prey in adulthood. In this study we used large and representative newborn and adult venom samples consisting of pools from 694 and 110 specimens, respectively, and demonstrate a significant ontogenetic shift in the venom proteome complexity of B. jararaca. 2-DE coupled to MS protein identification showed a clear rearrangement of the toxin arsenal both in terms of the total proteome, as of the glycoproteome. N-glycosylation seems to play a key role in venom protein variability between newborn and adult specimens. Upon the snake development, the subproteome of metalloproteinases undergoes a shift from a P-III-rich to a P-I-rich profile while the serine proteinase profile does not vary significantly. We also used isobaric tag labeling (iTRAQ) of venom tryptic peptides for the first time to examine the quantitative changes in the venom toxins of B. jararaca upon neonate to adult transition. The iTRAQ analysis showed changes in various toxin classes, especially the proteinases. Our study expands the in-depth understanding of venom complexity variation particularly with regard to toxin families that have been associated with envenomation pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据