4.5 Article

Identification of proteins secreted by head and neck cancer cell lines using LC-MS/MS: Strategy for discovery of candidate serological biomarkers

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 2363-2376

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000186

关键词

Biomarkers; Cell biology; Head and neck cancer; 1-D LC-MS/MS; Secretome; Secretory proteins

资金

  1. Joseph and Mildred Sonshine Centre for Head and Neck Diseases
  2. Alex and Simona Shnaider Research Laboratory in Molecular Oncology
  3. Temmy Latner/Dynacare
  4. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  6. Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In search of blood-based biomarkers that would enhance the ability to diagnose head and neck/oral squamous cell carcinoma (HNOSCC) in early stages or predict its prognosis, we analyzed the HNOSCC secretome (ensemble of proteins secreted and/or shed from the tumor cells) for potential biomarkers using proteomic technologies. LC-MS/MS was used to identify proteins in the conditioned media of four HNOSCC cell lines (SCC4, HSC2, SCC38, and AMOSIII); 140 unique proteins were identified on the basis of 5% global false discovery rate, 122 of which were secretory proteins, with 29 being previously reported to be overexpressed in HNOSCC in comparison to normal head and neck tissues. Of these, five proteins including alpha-enolase, peptidyl prolyl isomerase A/cyclophilin A, 14-3-3 zeta, heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein K, and 14-3-3 sigma were detected in the sera of HNOSCC patients by Western blot analysis. Our study provides the evidence that analysis of head and neck cancer cells' secretome is a viable strategy for identifying candidate serological biomarkers for HNOSCC. In future, these biomarkers may be useful in predicting the likelihood of transformation of oral pre-malignant lesions, prognosis of HNOSCC patients and evaluate response to therapy using minimally invasive tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据