4.5 Article

Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system is recruited to detergent-resistant lipid rafts during myogenesis

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 10, 期 13, 页码 2498-2515

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900826

关键词

Capillary RPLC/MS/MS; Cell biology; Lipid rafts; Myogenesis; Oxidative phosphorylation proteins; Respiration

资金

  1. KOSEF [R01-2004-000-10765-0]
  2. Korea Research Foundation [KTF-2008-C00286]
  3. 21C Frontier for Functional Proteomics [FPR08A1-010]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [R01-2004-000-10765-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since detergent-resistant lipid rafts play important roles in the signal transduction for myogenesis, their comprehensive proteomic analysis could provide new insights to understand their function in myotubes. Here, the detergent-resistant lipid rafts were isolated from C2C12 myotubes and analyzed by capillary RPLC/MS/MS Among the 327 proteins (or protein groups) identified, 28% were categorized to the plasma membrane or raft proteins, 29% to mitochondria, 20% to microsomal proteins, 10% to other proteins, and 13% to unknown proteins. The localization of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complexes in the sarcolemma lipid rafts was further confirmed from C2C12 myotubes by cellular fractionation, surface-biotin labeling, immunofluorescence, and lipid raft fractionation. After adding exogenous cytochrome c, the sarcolemma isolated from myotubes had an ability to consume oxygen in the presence of NADH or succinate. The generation of NADH-dependent extracellular superoxide was increased by inhibiting or downregulating OXPHOS I, III, and IV in myotubes, indicating that OXPHOS proteins are major sources for extracellular ROS in skeletal muscle. With all these data, we can conclude that OXPHOS proteins are associated with the sarcolemma lipid rafts during C2C12 myogenesis to generate extracellular ROS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据