4.5 Article

Proteomic analysis of doxorubicin-induced changes in the proteome of HepG2cells combining 2-D DIGE and LC-MS/MS approaches

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 99-114

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200800626

关键词

1-D electrophoresis in combination with LC-MS/MS; 2-D DIGE; Cell biology; Differential protein expression; Doxorubicin-induced toxicity; Stable isotope labeling

资金

  1. BMBF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HepG-2 cells are widely used as a cell model to investigate hepatocellular carcinomas and the effect of anticancer drugs such as doxorubicin, an effective antineoplastic agent, which has broad antitumoral activity against many solid and hematological malignancies. To investigate the effect of doxorubicin on the protein pattern, we used complementary proteomic work-flows including 2-D gel-based and gel-free methods. The analysis of crude HepG2 cell extracts by 2-D DIGE provided data on 1835 protein spots which was then complemented by MS-centered analysis of stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture-labeled cells. The monitoring of more than 1300 distinct proteins, including proteins of the membrane fraction provides the most comprehensive overview on the proteome of the widely used model cell line HepG2. Of the proteins monitored in total, 155 displayed doxorubicin-induced changes in abundance. Functional analysis revealed major influences of doxorubicin on proteins involved in protein synthesis, DNA damage control, electron transport/mitochondrial function, and tumor growth. The strongest decrease in level was found for proteins involved in DNA replication and protein synthesis, whereas proteins with a function in DNA damage control and oxidative stress management displayed increased levels following treatment with doxorubicin compared with control cells. Furthermore, the doxorubicin-associated increase in levels of multiple forms of keratins 8, 18, and 19 and other structural proteins revealed an influence on the cytoskeleton network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据