4.5 Article

Estimating false discovery rates for peptide and protein identification using randomized databases

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 2369-2376

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900619

关键词

Bioinformatics; False discovery rates; Peptide identification; Protein identification; Randomized databases

资金

  1. NIH [5R01 GM076680-02, UO1 DK072473]
  2. NSF [DBI-0544757, NSF-07140]
  3. McMillen Foundation
  4. University of Washington's Proteomics Resource [UWPR95794]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MS-based proteomics characterizes protein contents of biological samples. The most common approach is to first match observed MS/MS peptide spectra against theoretical spectra from a protein sequence database and then to score these matches. The false discovery rate (FDR) can be estimated as a function of the score by searching together the protein sequence database and its randomized version and comparing the score distributions of the randomized versus nonrandomized matches. This work introduces a straightforward isotonic regression-based method to estimate the cumulative FDRs and local FDRs (LFDRs) of peptide identification. Our isotonic method not only performed as well as other methods used for comparison, but also has the advantages of being: (i) monotonic in the score, (ii) computationally simple, and (iii) not dependent on assumptions about score distributions. We demonstrate the flexibility of our approach by using it to estimate FDRs and LFDRs for protein identification using summaries of the peptide spectra scores. We reconfirmed that several of these methods were superior to a two-peptide rule. Finally, by estimating both the FDRs and LFDRs, we showed for both peptide and protein identification, moderate FDR values (5%) corresponded to large LFDR values (53 and 60%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据