4.8 Article

A Tale of Two Sites: On Defining the Carrier Concentration in Garnet-Based Ionic Conductors for Advanced Li Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201500096

关键词

batteries; garnet; ionic conductivity; neutron diffraction; solid electrolytes

资金

  1. Revolutionary Materials for Solid State Energy Conversion, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Science [DE-SC001054]
  2. U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL)
  3. Office of Naval Research through the Naval Research Laboratory's Basic Research Program
  4. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid electrolytes based on the garnet crystal structure have recently been identified as a promising material to enable advance Li battery cell chemistries because of the unprecedented combination of high ionic conductivity and electrochemical stability against metallic Li. To better understand the mechanisms that give rise to high conductivity, the goal of this work is to correlate Li site occupancy with Li-ion transport. Toward this goal, the Li site occupancy is studied in cubic garnet as a function of Li concentration over the compositions range: Li7-xLa3Zr2-xTaxO12 (x = 0.5, 0.75, and 1.5). The distribution of Li between the two interstitial sites (24d and 96h) is determined using neutron and synchrotron diffraction. The bulk conductivity is measured on >97% relative density polycrystalline specimens to correlate Li-ion transport as a function of Li site occupancy. It is determined that the conductivity changes nonlinearly with the occupancy of the octahedral (96h) Li site. It is shown that the effective carrier concentration is dependent on the Li site occupancy and suggests that this is a consequence of significant carrier-carrier coulombic interactions. Furthermore, the observation of maximum conductivity near Li = 6.5 mol is explained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据