4.8 Article

Engineering Mixed Ionic Electronic Conduction in La0.8Sr0.2MnO3+ Nanostructures through Fast Grain Boundary Oxygen Diffusivity

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201500377

关键词

grain boundary engineering; mixed ionic electronic conductors; nanoionics; thin films

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [ENE2013-47826]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya-AGAUR [2014 SGR 1638]
  3. European Regional Development Funds (ERDF, FEDER Programa Competitivitat de Catalunya)
  4. Ramon y Cajal postdoctoral program
  5. Juan de la Cierva postdoctoral program
  6. Kaust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoionics has become an increasingly promising field for the future development of advanced energy conversion and storage devices, such as batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors. Particularly, nanostructured materials offer unique properties or combinations of properties as electrodes and electrolytes in a range of energy devices. However, the enhancement of the mass transport properties at the nanoscale has often been found to be difficult to implement in nanostructures. Here, an artificial mixed ionic electronic conducting oxide is fabricated by grain boundary (GB) engineering thin films of La0.8Sr0.2MnO3+. This electronic conductor is converted into a good mixed ionic electronic conductor by synthesizing a nanostructure with high density of vertically aligned GBs with high concentration of strain-induced defects. Since this type of GBs present a remarkable enhancement of their oxide-ion mass transport properties (of up to six orders of magnitude at 773 K), it is possible to tailor the electrical nature of the whole material by nanoengineering, especially at low temperatures. The presented results lead to fundamental insights into oxygen diffusion along GBs and to the application of these engineered nanomaterials in new advanced solid state ionics devices such are micro-solid oxide fuel cells or resistive switching memories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据