4.5 Review

Image analysis tools and emerging algorithms for expression proteomics

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 10, 期 23, 页码 4226-4257

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900635

关键词

2-DE; Bioinformatics; Image analysis; Imaging MS; LC; Proteome informatics

资金

  1. EU [034202]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland [04/RPI/B499]
  3. EPSRC UK [EP/E03988X/1, GR/T06735/01]
  4. EPSRC [EP/E03988X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/T06735/01, EP/E03988X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since their origins in academic endeavours in the 1970s computational analysis tools have matured into a number of established commercial packages that underpin research m expression proteomics In this paper we describe the image analysis pipeline for the established 2 DE technique of protein separation and by first covering signal analysis for MS we also explain the current image analysis workflow for the emerging high throughput shotgun proteomics platform of LC coupled to MS (LC/MS) The bioinformatics challenges for both methods are illustrated and compared whereas existing commercial and academic packages and their workflows are described from both a user s and a technical perspective Attention is given to the importance of sound statistical treatment of the resultant quantifications in the search for differential expression Despite wide availability of proteomics software a number of challenges have yet to be overcome regarding algorithm accuracy objectivity and automation generally due to deterministic spot centric approaches that discard information early in the pipeline propagating errors We review recent advances in signal and image analysis algorithms in 2 DE MS LC/MS and Imaging MS Particular attention is given to wavelet techniques automated image based alignment and differential analysis in 2 DE Bayesian peak mixture models and functional mixed modelling in MS and group wise consensus alignment methods for LC/MS

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据