4.5 Article

Analysis of earthworm Eisenia fetida proteomes during cadmium exposure: An ecotoxicoproteomics approach

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 10, 期 24, 页码 4476-4490

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000209

关键词

Animal proteomics; Cadmium; Ecotoxicoproteomics; Eisenia fetida; Invertebrates

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30470220, 30770275]
  2. National Key Technology R&D Program in the 11th Five year Plan of China [2008BADA7B04]
  3. Key Beijing Discipline of Ecology [XK10019440]
  4. China Agricultural University Basic R&D Operating Expenses [kycx09068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identification of differential proteomic responses to cadmium (Cd) would provide a means for better understanding the survival mechanisms of the earthworm, Eisenia fetida, living in a Cd-polluted environment, and the stress responses can be assessed by ecotoxiptoromics approaches. Extracts of whole earthworm collected at days 7, 14, 21, and 28 after Cd exposure were analyzed by 2-DE and quantitative image analysis. In total, 143 proteins demonstrated significant regulation in at least at one time point, and 56 proteins were identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS and database searching. Compared with control samples, 28 protein spots were up-regulated and 28 were down-regulated during at least one time point. The identified proteins, including chaperonine protein HSP60, caspase-8, calcium ion-binding protein, zinc ion-binding protein, actin-binding protein, proteolysis, fibrinolytic protease, glutamate dehydrogenase, gelsolin-like protein, lombricine kinase, coelomic cytolytic factor 1, manganous superoxide dismutase, extracellular globin-4, lysenin, intermediate filament protein, and tubulin, are involved in several processes, including transcription, translation, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, the cellular amino acid metabolic process, protein amino acid phosphorylation, glycolysis, and the glucose metabolic process. Thus, our study provides a functional profile of the Cd-responsive proteins in earthworms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据