4.5 Article

The seminal fluid proteome of the honeybee Apis mellifera

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 2085-2097

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200800708

关键词

Drosophila; Ejaculate; Human; MS/MS; Reproductive success

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [CE0561495]
  3. Australian Post-Doctoral Fellowships

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ejaculates contain sperm but also seminal fluid, which is increasingly recognized to be of central importance for reproductive success. However, a detailed biochemical composition and physiological understanding of seminal fluid is still elusive. We have used MS to identify the 57 most abundant proteins within the ejaculated seminal fluid of the honeybee Apis mellifiera. Their amino acid sequences revealed the presence of diverse functional categories of enzymes, regulators and structural proteins. A number have known or predicted roles in maintaining sperm viability, protecting sperm from microbial infections or interacting with the physiology of the female. A range of putative glycoproteins or glycosylation enzymes were detected among the 57, subsequent fluorescent staining of glycolysation revealed several prominant glycoproteins in seminal fluid, while no glycoproteins were detected in sperm samples. Many of the abundant proteins that accumulate in the seminal fluid did not contain predictable tags for secretion for the cell. Comparison of the honeybee seminal fluid proteins with Drosophila seminal fluid proteins (including secreted accessory gland proteins known as ACPs), and with the human seminal fluid proteome revealed the bee protein set contains a range of newly identified seminal fluid proteins and we noted more similarity of the bee protein set with the current human seminal fluid protein set than with the known Drosophila seminal fluid proteins. The honeybee seminal fluid proteome thus represents an important addition to available data for comparative studies of seminal fluid proteomes in insects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据