4.8 Article

Facile Synthesis of a 3D Nanoarchitectured Li4Ti5O12 Electrode for Ultrafast Energy Storage

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201500924

关键词

3D current collector; binder-free; lithium-ion batteries; lithium titanate; nanocrystals

资金

  1. Key Projects in Nature Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2011030]
  2. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51025209]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21103089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite enormous efforts devoted to the development of high-performance batteries, the obtainable energy and power density, durability, and affordability of the existing batteries are still inadequate for many applications. Here, a self-standing nanostructured electrode with ultrafast cycling capability is reported by in situ tailoring Li4Ti5O12 nanocrystals into a 3D carbon current collector (derived from filter paper) through a facile wet chemical process involving adsorption of titanium source, boiling treatment, and subsequent chemical lithiation. This 3D architectural electrode is charged/discharged to approximate to 60% of the theoretical capacity of Li4Ti5O12 in approximate to 21 s at 100 C rate (17 500 mA g(-1) ), which also shows stable cycling performance for 1000 cycles at a cycling rate of 50 C. Additionally, modified 3D carbon current collector with much smaller pores and finer fiber diameters are further used, which significantly improve the specific capacity based on the weight of the entire electrode. These novel electrodes are promising for high-power applications such as electric vehicles and smart grids. This unique electrode architecture also simplifies the electrode fabrication process and significantly enhances current collection efficiency (especially at high rate). Further, the conceptual electrode design is applicable to other oxide electrode materials for high-performance batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据