4.5 Article

Identification and quantification of proteins differentially secreted by a pair of normal and malignant breast-cancer cell lines

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 182-193

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200700957

关键词

Breast cancer; Protein expression; Protein marker discovery; Stable isotope labelling; Tandem mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secreted proteins play a pivotal role in cellular functions. To better understand malignant behavior, we adapted stable isotopic labeling with amino acids in cell culture technology to identify and quantify proteins differentially released into the extracellular media by a pair of normal and malignant breast-cancer cell lines. Approximately 380 non-redundant proteins were quantified in serum-free media. Of the assigned proteins, 62% are classified secreted in protein databases and an additional 25% are designated secreted in the literature. A number of growth factors were found differentially regulated. Tumor necrosis factor, pigment epithelial-differentiating factor and stem-cell growth factor precursor showed decreased expression in breast-cancer cell line, whereas Inhibin beta and macrophage migration inhibitory factor show increased expression. interestingly, protease inhibitors, including plasma protease (Cl) inhibitor, PZP precursor, and SerpinE2 were significantly down-regulated in cancer cell line as were angiostatic factors from extracellular matrix (ECM) such as endorepillin. Further, the C-terminal fragment of type XVIII collagen, endostatin, a potent angiostatic factor, was down-regulated as well whereas extracellular collagens and osteoblast-specific factor 2 (OSF-2), were up-regulated. Differential expression and secretion of SerpinE2 and OSF-2 were confirmed using Western blotting. These results corroborate models of invasive tumors sustained by elaborate coordination of stromal cells via chemokines and growth factors, while protease inhibitors remodel the ECM to stimulate angiogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据