4.5 Article

Proteomic profiling of PrP27-30-enriched preparations extracted from the brain of hamsters with experimental scrapie

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 9, 期 15, 页码 3802-3814

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900085

关键词

FT-ICR; MALDI-TOF/TOF; Prion protein; PrP27-30; Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies

资金

  1. EU Specific Targeted [SP5A-CT-2007-044438]
  2. Italian Ministry of Health Progetto Strategico
  3. ISS-NIH
  4. ISS
  5. Ministero dell'Istruzione dell'Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR) [20078RWJBN_004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) are neurodegenerative disorders characterized by the accumulation in the CNS of a pathological conformer (Prp(TSE)) of the host-encoded cellular prion protein (PrPC). PrPTSE has a central role in the pathogenesis of the disease but other factors are likely involved in the pathological process. in this work we employed a multi-step proteomic approach for the identification of proteins that co-purify with the protease-resistant core of PrPTSE (PrP27-30) extracted from brains of hamsters with experimental scrapie. We identified ferritin, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase alpha type II apolipoprotein E, and tubulin as the major components associated with PrP27-30 but also trace amounts of actin, cofilin, Hsp90 alpha, the gamma subunit of the T-complex protein 1, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, histones, and keratins. Whereas some of these proteins (tubulin and ferritin) are known to bind PrP, other proteins (calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase alpha type II, Hsp90 alpha) may associate with PrPTSE fibrils during disease. Apolipoprotein E and actin have been previously observed in association with Prp(TSE), whereas cofilin and actin were shown to form abnormal rods in the brain of patients with Alzheimer disease. The roles of these proteins in the development of brain lesions are still unclear and further work is needed to explain their involvement in the pathogenesis of TSEs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据