4.5 Article

Growth phase-dependent global protein and metabolite profiles of Phaeobacter gallaeciensis strain DSM 17395, a member of the marine Roseobacter-clade

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 9, 期 14, 页码 3677-3697

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900120

关键词

Carbohydrate catabolism; Functional genomics; Metabolomics; Phaeobacter gallaeciensis

资金

  1. Niedersachsisches VW-Vorab, Germany [ZN2235]
  2. Marine Microbiology Initiative of the Moore-Foundation, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The marine heterotrophic roseobacter Phaeobacter gallaeciensis DSM 17395 was grown with glucose in defined mineral medium. Relative abundance changes of global protein (2-D DIGE) and metabolite (GC-MS) profiles were determined across five different time points of growth. In total, 215 proteins were identified and 147 metabolites detected (101 structurally identified), among which 60 proteins and 87 metabolites displayed changed abundances upon entry into stationary growth phase. Glucose breakdown to pyruvate apparently proceeds via the Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway, since phosphofructokinase of the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway is missing and the key metabolite of the ED-pathway, 2-keto-3-desoxygluconate, was detected. The absence of pfk in other genome-sequenced roseobacters suggests that the use of the ED pathway is an important physiological property among these heterotrophic marine bacteria. Upon entry into stationary growth phase (due to glucose starvation), sulfur assimilation (including cysteine biosynthesis) and parts of cell envelope synthesis (e.g. the lipid precursor 1-monooleoylglycerol) were down-regulated and cadaverine formation up-regulated. In contrast, central carbon catabolism remained essentially unchanged, pointing to a metabolic stand-by modus as an ecophysiological adaptation strategy. Stationary phase response of P. gallaeciensis differs markedly from that of standard organisms such as Escherichia coli, as evident e.g. by the absence of an rpoS gene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据