4.3 Article

Prescont: Predicting protein-protein interfaces utilizing four residue properties

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23172

关键词

support vector machine; machine learning; protein complexes; residue classification

资金

  1. Bavarian Genome Research Network (BayGene)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An important task of computational biology is to identify those parts of a polypeptide chain, which are involved in interactions with other proteins. For this purpose, we have developed the program PresCont, which predicts in a robust manner amino acids that constitute protein-protein interfaces (PPIs). PresCont reaches state-of-the-art classification quality on the basis of only four residue properties that can be readily deduced from the 3D structure of an individual protein and a multiple sequence alignment (MSA) composed of homologs. The core of PresCont is a support vector machine, which assesses solvent-accessible surface area, hydrophobicity, conservation, and the local environment of each amino acid on the protein surface. For training and performance testing, we compiled three nonoverlapping datasets consisting of permanently formed or transient complexes, respectively. A comparison with SPPIDER, ProMate, and meta-PPISP showed that PresCont compares favorably with these highly sophisticated programs, and that its prediction quality is less dependent on the type of protein complex being considered. This balance is due to a mutual compensation of classification weaknesses observed for individual properties: For PPIs of permanent complexes, solvent-accessible surface and hydrophobicity contribute most to classification quality, for PPIs of transient complexes, the assessment of the local environment is most significant. Moreover, we show that for permanent complexes a segmentation of PPIs into core and rim residues has only a moderate influence on prediction quality. PresCont is available as a web service at . Proteins 2012; (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据