4.3 Article

Multibody coarse-grained potentials for native structure recognition and quality assessment of protein models

期刊

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
卷 79, 期 6, 页码 1923-1929

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23015

关键词

coarse-grained models; proteins; statistical potentials; multibody potentials; protein modeling; threading; optimization

资金

  1. NIH [R01GM072014, R01GM081680, R01GM081680-S1]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1021785] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multibody potentials have been of much interest recently because they take into account three dimensional interactions related to residue packing and capture the cooperativity of these interactions in protein structures. Our goal was to combine long range multibody potentials and short range potentials to improve recognition of native structure among misfolded decoys. We optimized the weights for four-body nonsequential, four-body sequential, and short range potentials to obtain optimal model ranking results for threading and have compared these data against results obtained with other potentials (26 different coarse-grained potentials from the Potentials 'R'Us web server have been used). Our optimized multibody potentials outperform all other contact potentials in the recognition of the native structure among decoys, both for models from homology template-based modeling and from template-free modeling in CASP8 decoy sets. We have compared the results obtained for this optimized coarse-grained potentials, where each residue is represented by a single point, with results obtained by using the DFIRE potential, which takes into account atomic level information of proteins. We found that for all proteins larger than 80 amino acids our optimized coarse-grained potentials yield results comparable to those obtained with the atomic DFIRE potential. Proteins 2011; 79:1923-1929. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据