4.3 Article

Conserved amino acid networks involved in antibody variable domain interactions

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22319

关键词

immunoglobulin variable domain; Ig-fold; V-class; covariation; antibody engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Engineered antibodies are a large and growing class of protein therapeutics comprising both marketed products and many molecules in clinical trials in various disease indications. We investigated naturally conserved networks of amino acids that support antibody V-H and V-L function, with the goal of generating information to assist in the engineering of robust antibody or antibody-like therapeutics. We generated a large and diverse sequence alignment of V-class Ig-folds, of which V-H and V-L domains are family members. To identify conserved amino acid networks, covariations between residues at all possible position pairs were quantified as correlation coefficients (phi-values). We provide rosters of the key conserved amino acid pairs in antibody V-H and V-L domains, for reference and use by the antibody research community. The majority of the most strongly conserved amino acid pairs in V-H and V-L are at or adjacent to the V-H-V-L interface suggesting that the ability to heterodimerize is a constraining feature of antibody evolution. For the VH domain, but not the V-L domain, residue pairs at the variable-constant domain interface (V-H-C(H)1 interface) are also strongly conserved. The same network of conserved V-H positions involved in interactions with both the V-H and C(H)1 domains is found in camelid V-HH domains, which have evolved to lack interactions with V-L and C(H)1 domains in their mature structures; however, the amino acids at these positions are different, reflecting their different function. Overall, the data describe naturally occurring amino acid networks in antibody Fv regions that can be referenced when designing antibodies or antibody-Me fragments with the goal of improving their biophysical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据