4.3 Article

Quantitative expression of protein heterogeneity: Response of amino acid side chains to their local environment

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21958

关键词

hydrophobic matching; protein heterogeneity; microenvironments; hydrophobicity of local environments; Rekker hydrophobic fragmental constants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A general method has been developed to characterize the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of the microenvironment (MENV), in which a given amino acid side chain is immersed, by calculating a quantitative property descriptor (QPD) based on the relative (to water) hydrophobicity of the MENV Values of the QPD were calculated for a test set of 733 proteins to analyze the modulating effects on amino acid residue properties by the MENV in which they are imbedded. The QPD values and solvent accessibility were used to derive a partitioning of residues based on the MEN-V hydrophobicities. From this partitioning, a new hydrophobicity scale was developed, entirely in the context of protein structure, where amino acid residues are immersed in one or more MENVpockets. Thus, the partitioning is based on the residues sampling a large number of solvents (MEN-Vs) that represent a very large range of hydrophobicity values. It was found that the hydrophobicity of around 80% of amino acid side chains and their MENV are complementary to each other, but for about 209,6, the MEW and their imbedded residue can be considered as mismatched. Many of these mismatches could be rationalized in terms of the structural stability of the protein and/or the involvement of the imbedded residue in function. The analysis also indicated a remarkable conservation of local environments around highly conserved active site residues that have similar functions across protein families, but where members have relatively low sequence homology. Thus, quantitative evaluation of this QPD is suggested, here, as a tool for structure-function prediction, analysis, and parameter development for the calculation of properties in proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据